Ridgeline AI

Industry

Critical Infrastructure

OT/ICS risk depends on assets, controls, networks, conditions, and business impact - but the teams that own each piece rarely share a picture.

The operating reality.

Risk in critical infrastructure is a joint function of four things that are almost never held by the same team: what assets exist and how they are configured, how they are connected, what is known to be wrong with them, and what happens to the service if they stop. Security owns the vulnerability data. Operations owns the process consequence. Engineering owns the configuration. The result is a remediation queue sorted by severity score rather than by consequence, which is how organizations spend a quarter patching things that could not have hurt them.

Ridgeline AI assembles the joint picture. OT and ICS asset inventories, network topology, vulnerability and advisory feeds, operating procedures, and service impact models are bound into one graph, so criticality is derived rather than asserted. Remediation is sequenced by what the loss of a given function would actually do to the service, and the reasoning behind that sequence is inspectable by the people who have to sign the change.

The same model shortens response. During an incident, the question is not only what is affected but what depends on it, which procedure applies, who is qualified, and what the safe fallback state is. Holding that in a model rather than in binders means the answer arrives while it is still useful.

Evidence in context

Systems stay authoritative. Decisions become connected.

Typical evidence

  • OT/ICS asset inventories
  • Network data
  • Vulnerability data
  • Procedures
  • Impact models

Decisions supported

  • Asset criticality
  • Remediation sequencing
  • Response planning
Swipe · 01 / 01