Sovereignty · who owns what

Your operating record stays yours.

Seven governed layers keep data, meaning, model choice, workflows and decision authority portable so the organization can keep operating as technology changes.

Review the sovereignty model →
01 / Data boundary

Operational records Residency, retention and access remain explicit

  • Ownership
  • Residency
  • Export

Seven layers build from data boundary through compute, model choice, semantic definitions, workflows and decision rights to a retained operating record.

1 / 7
01 / assurance is a gradient

Chosen per workload, not sold as a toggle.

The same operating layer runs at three levels of assurance. Sensitive records and regulated data sit at the strong end of that gradient.

HostedSigned provider termsFastest path to a working operating layer. Model-call retention, training use, and human-review limits are set by the approved provider terms for the workload.
Dedicated environmentIsolated tenancyA separate environment for your operation, with its own data boundary, keys, and network posture, suited to sensitive records and regulated workloads.
Your own cloudClient-controlledThe layer runs inside the environment you already control and audit. Residency, retention, and access follow your policy, not ours.
02 / who owns what

Stated plainly, in writing.

Yours

  • Your operating data
  • Your metric definitions and their version history
  • The decision ledger and outcome history
  • Models or tuning artifacts contractually assigned to your operation
  • Exportable in agreed open formats under the engagement terms

Never

  • Your data sold, shared, or used to train another client's intelligence
  • Provider retention or training use outside the approved terms
  • Definitions or model versions changed beneath you without your approval
  • Unapproved export fees, surprise egress penalties, or audit-as-revenue

Ours

  • The platform and runtime
  • The agent framework
  • The delivery teams
  • The product roadmap
03 / commitments

The exit door stays unlocked.

No model lock-in

The layer is model-agnostic. Your ontology, workflows, and record live outside any model, so models stay swappable inputs. A better model next year is an upgrade, not a migration.

Your record is scoped to your use

Where a workflow earns a task-specific model or tuning artifact, ownership, reuse, retention, and export are defined in the engagement terms. Your operating playbook does not become another client's feature.

No rules changed beneath you

Definitions are versioned and model versions are pinned per workflow. Changes route through your approval, on your calendar, never silently mid-season.

Human authority is retained

Recommendations carry their sources, and consequential actions are designed to require an authorized human decision. Sovereignty includes who is allowed to act.

Evaluation is part of the boundary

Accuracy, permission behavior, writeback, refusal, and rollback are checked against the workflow before expansion. The assurance bar changes with the action and the environment.

Review the terms against your own governance model.